Slow-Moving Stock Analysis: How Much Money Is Sitting in Your Warehouse

Stock sitting in a warehouse is frozen cash — yet few businesses know how much cash, and in which items. This report lets you choose an assessment period in months and shows which items have not moved during that time.

Slow-moving stock analysis — Power BI report example

What decisions it helps you make

  • What to mark down or clear. Items that have not moved for six months rarely start moving on their own.
  • What to stop ordering. The slow-moving stock list feeds directly into the purchasing plan.
  • How much working capital can be freed up. The total stock value shows the real potential.
  • Whether the problem is systemic. If slow-moving stock is concentrated in one product group or with one supplier, the cause is not random.

What you see in the report

  • a selectable period in months over which slow-moving stock is assessed;
  • the slowest-moving items, with stock balances and suppliers;
  • the fastest-moving items;
  • a list of all slow-moving items and the total number of units;
  • items whose stock balances have not moved since a specific date;
  • the movement history of a selected item (purchases and sales).

How to read this report

Start by choosing the period — it should match the rhythm of your business. In seasonal trade, three months means nothing, whereas for fast-moving goods it is already a warning sign.

Next, look at stock balance together with supplier. If one supplier’s product group consistently goes stale, the conversation needs to be with purchasing, not the warehouse.

What idle stock really costs

The purchase price is only the start. Every year, it is added to by:

  • frozen cash — the same sum could have been in circulation or paid down debt;
  • warehouse space taken up by stock that does not move;
  • depreciation — the value of seasonal, technological or simply outdated goods falls by itself;
  • write-off risk, if the item eventually proves unsaleable.

That is why “we’ll hold on to it, maybe it’ll sell” almost always costs more than marking it down now. An item that has sat on the shelf for a year has usually cost more than a 30% discount would have cost a year earlier.

How to choose the period

The period should reflect the item’s turnover rate, not the calendar. In practice, the following guide works:

  • fast-moving goods (food, everyday consumables) — 1–2 months;
  • regular trade — 3–6 months;
  • seasonal goods — one full season, so assessment only makes sense once it is over;
  • spare parts and rarely sold items — 12 months or more.

The mistake we see most often is using a single period for the entire range. Either seasonal items wrongly end up on the list, or problems with fast-moving goods go unnoticed.

What to do with the list

A slow-moving stock report is only useful when it leads to decisions. In practice there are three: mark down and clear, return to the supplier if the contract allows, or write off and free up the space.

And the most important, often forgotten fourth — stop ordering. The list feeds directly into the purchasing plan: the same items should not return to the warehouse next quarter.

You can see which items actually make money in the stock movement analysis.

How to get this report

Slow-moving stock analytics is included in the Rivilė PRO and Finvalda PRO packages. You will find the full list of reports on the pricing page.

Further reading

Want reports like these for your own business?

Analitika360 builds Power BI reports from the data already in your accounting system — Rivilė, Finvalda or R-Keeper. They refresh automatically, from €59 a month.

Pricing and plans
Analitika360 client stories

Data that helps you decide

See how companies like yours put Analitika360 reports to work in Power BI.

“
We took the standard R-Keeper report package and they tailored it to us on top of that. It all just works.
TB
Tomas B.restaurant owner
“
Twenty ready-made reports — we didn't have to work out what to ask for. Our Finvalda data is finally something you can look at. Recommended.
IM
Ingrida M.accountant
“
What we liked was that Analitika360 already had a 20-report package for Rivilė users — we didn't have to work out our requirements from scratch. We were up and running quickly, and later they adapted several reports to the specifics of our production. It saved us both time and money.
MK
Marius K.finance director
“
We are a group of companies running Rivilė, and consolidated reporting was always a headache. Analitika360 started from the standard 20-report package and then fitted it to our group structure — we now see everything in one Power BI model, and it refreshes itself.
GJ
Giedrė Jankauskaitėfinancial accountant
“
We run six restaurants on R-Keeper and had long been looking for a way to compare results across sites. The standard 20-report package covered most of what we needed, and reports specific to our group were added later.
AŠ
Andrius Š.director of a restaurant group
“
We came to them on a recommendation, and the ready-made 20-report standard for Finvalda users was a pleasant surprise straight away. Management now gets a clear financial picture every Monday, and I no longer spend days exporting data into Excel.
RP
Rasa Petrauskienėhead of accounting
“
We use Rivilė, but we never had time to build reports from scratch. The 20-report package was exactly what we needed — we had it running within a week.
VP
Vaidas P.retail chain manager
“
We have four cafés on R-Keeper and for a long time we ran them on gut feel. The Analitika360 reports showed us things we had simply never noticed. We now decide on the numbers rather than on guesswork.
LK
Laura Kazlauskienėfinance director of a café group